3 ms·

It appears that your perspective on the matter at hand diverges from mine, and I suspect that you may have ulterior motives beyond simply discussing the factual

It appears that your perspective on the matter at hand diverges from mine, and I suspect that you may have ulterior motives beyond simply discussing the factual information that is relevant to the conversation. Regardless, I hope you have a pleasant day.

aa-jv 4y ago
My agenda is to disallow the minimization of crimes against humanity, which is what this is. Your agenda appears to be to justify it in an attempt to minimize the impact. Unfortunately, it appears you are therefore aligned with the criminals themselves. In which case, I hope your day is spent considering the ills of your life. Nobody should be attempting to justify these kinds of crimes against humanity. There is simply no excuse for the mass collection of human biometric data - especially in a region where crimes against humanity and war crimes are consistently (daily) being committed by the so-called 'morally authoritative' parties involved ..
- theCrowing 4y ago
  [flagged]
  - aa-jv 4y ago
    I do not believe that is the case at all. I believe I have a rational, sane approach to the commission of crimes against humanity, whereas your view seeks to justify those crimes - which can only be done under conditions of extreme delusion. "Therefore, the assertion that the data of the whole afghan population is readily accessible seems somewhat exaggerated" No, this is not correct. The assertion that the data of the whole afghan population is readily accessible is not negated by the 'mere' existence of 'only two devices'. These two facts are not related. The truth is this: 1. The entire Afghan populations' biometric data was captured and is now in the hands of a totalitarian-authoritarian body that will actually use it to murder people. 2. This biometric data has started to leak - for example, the two devices easily obtained by CCC hackers. 3. It can be asserted with confidence that further leaks are possible. None of this justifies the capture of human biometric data.
    - theCrowing 4y ago
      Your comments are anything but rational and I am not disregarding the fact that alone the existence of two unwiped devices is absolutely repulsive. I am just arguing for a factual discussion and the actual representation of the information at hand instead of making assumptions and insinuations like you do. The only thing that will come from being dishonest and passive aggressive is that no one will take you seriously.
      - aa-jv 4y ago
        Please examine your use of vitriol. It may reveal an aspect of this argument you have not fully considered.

aa-jv 4y ago

My agenda is to disallow the minimization of crimes against humanity, which is what this is. Your agenda appears to be to justify it in an attempt to minimize the impact. Unfortunately, it appears you are therefore aligned with the criminals themselves. In which case, I hope your day is spent considering the ills of your life. Nobody should be attempting to justify these kinds of crimes against humanity. There is simply no excuse for the mass collection of human biometric data - especially in a region where crimes against humanity and war crimes are consistently (daily) being committed by the so-called 'morally authoritative' parties involved ..

theCrowing 4y ago
[flagged]
- aa-jv 4y ago
  I do not believe that is the case at all. I believe I have a rational, sane approach to the commission of crimes against humanity, whereas your view seeks to justify those crimes - which can only be done under conditions of extreme delusion. "Therefore, the assertion that the data of the whole afghan population is readily accessible seems somewhat exaggerated" No, this is not correct. The assertion that the data of the whole afghan population is readily accessible is not negated by the 'mere' existence of 'only two devices'. These two facts are not related. The truth is this: 1. The entire Afghan populations' biometric data was captured and is now in the hands of a totalitarian-authoritarian body that will actually use it to murder people. 2. This biometric data has started to leak - for example, the two devices easily obtained by CCC hackers. 3. It can be asserted with confidence that further leaks are possible. None of this justifies the capture of human biometric data.
  - theCrowing 4y ago
    Your comments are anything but rational and I am not disregarding the fact that alone the existence of two unwiped devices is absolutely repulsive. I am just arguing for a factual discussion and the actual representation of the information at hand instead of making assumptions and insinuations like you do. The only thing that will come from being dishonest and passive aggressive is that no one will take you seriously.
    - aa-jv 4y ago
      Please examine your use of vitriol. It may reveal an aspect of this argument you have not fully considered.