4 ms·
Skimming a couple of the sources mentioned in the article and the linked german government Q&A it seems they scanned a) collaborators and b) "potentially danger
by sally_glance 4y ago
Skimming a couple of the sources mentioned in the article and the linked german government Q&A it seems they scanned a) collaborators and b) "potentially dangerous" afghan citizens.
So we can reasonably assume that biometric data of those two population groups was leaked by left behind devices. Not the entire population, but the two most sensitive groups. Sounds pretty bad imo.
- theCrowing 4y agoAs I said before you are absolutely right it's fucking bad and repulsive but you can still communicate facts without making assumptions especially with a serious topic like this.
- rschneid 4y agoReading this polite exchange I couldn't help but be reminded of the classic: https://youtu.be/3m5qxZm_JqM https://youtu.be/3m5qxZm_JqM :) Glad we're all nice to each other in this corner of the web!
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]