3 ms·

Google and Amazon could just charge subscriptions. paying for email might be a hard pill to swallow, but paying for youtube ad free, drive, docs, photos and eve

Google and Amazon could just charge subscriptions. paying for email might be a hard pill to swallow, but paying for youtube ad free, drive, docs, photos and everything else.. sounds reasonable. Amazon already has prime. just require it for alexa. i don't know how they can add those fees now but it would have been reasonable if they just started that way instead of crossing their fingers Hoping they'd find a way to monetize in the future

SkipperCat 4y ago
I’d pay $12/year for gmail. That would give Google the revenue they need to keep everything humming along. I’ve been living with free e-mail for almost 25+ years now, but a dollar a month would be easy to rationalize for the service.
- lelanthran 4y ago
  I won't, unless I'm the customer, and get to speak to a human when my email is down. Right now I'm the product and so I have no expectation of customer service. When I'm paying 1 dollar a month I'm holding someone liable if I lose access to my account. And, legally, I can reasonably take Gmail to court for monetary loss and f I am a paying customer. 200k people going to small claims court for whatever will completely wipe out any profit that alphabet hopes to make of Gmail. So, yeah, it's cheaper for Gmail to provide free accounts with no liability than to get caught up in mandatory customer protection laws.
  - wepple 4y ago
    It looks like you get that for $1.99/mo. Talk to a real human: https://one.google.com/about/support https://one.google.com/about/support I have no experience of actually using it
  - amf12 4y ago
    You can do that right now by subscribing to their Workspace Individual plan.
- markbnj 4y ago
  I'm already paying a little more than that per year for 100GB of Drive storage. It gives me a highly durable backup that's accessible from anywhere. I would happily pay a similar amount for gmail.

SkipperCat 4y ago

I’d pay $12/year for gmail. That would give Google the revenue they need to keep everything humming along. I’ve been living with free e-mail for almost 25+ years now, but a dollar a month would be easy to rationalize for the service.

lelanthran 4y ago
I won't, unless I'm the customer, and get to speak to a human when my email is down. Right now I'm the product and so I have no expectation of customer service. When I'm paying 1 dollar a month I'm holding someone liable if I lose access to my account. And, legally, I can reasonably take Gmail to court for monetary loss and f I am a paying customer. 200k people going to small claims court for whatever will completely wipe out any profit that alphabet hopes to make of Gmail. So, yeah, it's cheaper for Gmail to provide free accounts with no liability than to get caught up in mandatory customer protection laws.
- wepple 4y ago
  It looks like you get that for $1.99/mo. Talk to a real human: https://one.google.com/about/support https://one.google.com/about/support I have no experience of actually using it
- amf12 4y ago
  You can do that right now by subscribing to their Workspace Individual plan.
markbnj 4y ago
I'm already paying a little more than that per year for 100GB of Drive storage. It gives me a highly durable backup that's accessible from anywhere. I would happily pay a similar amount for gmail.