I have seen very very good arguments that climate change is happening, but human's impact on it is most likely miniscule. If this is the indeed the truth, then

I have seen very very good arguments that climate change is happening, but human's impact on it is most likely miniscule. If this is the indeed the truth, then the trillions we currently invest in "reversing man made climate change" would be better invested in "preparing for the inevitable". Even if powerful people rally for free speech in order to achieve an (maybe evil) political goal, THATS OBVIOUSLY BETTER THAN using censorship to achieve a (probably evil) political goal. I find it unbelievable that this is such a hard concept to grasp. If powerful people use free speech to spread nonsense, then just present your counter arguments, god damnit. I know that it "takes more time to refute bullshit than to produce bullshit", sadly, that's just how it is. The bitcoin community has spent more than 12 years now to refute bullshit and people still fall for all the debunked FUD. This just means that we need a better tool to refute bullshit faster and more efficiently. Wikipedia was a good first try, but of course since it succumbed to the woke mind virus, it is no longer viable. There is a civilisation altering opportunity here to produce a new tool like it. I don't know how such a tool would look like.