16 ms·
Windows: Firefox https://i.imgur.com/j8djrhN.png https://i.imgur.com/j8djrhN.png Chrome https://i.imgur.com/mmBInsQ.png https://i.imgur.com/mmBInsQ.png Both
by Semaphor 4y ago
Windows:
Firefox https://i.imgur.com/j8djrhN.png https://i.imgur.com/j8djrhN.png
Chrome https://i.imgur.com/mmBInsQ.png https://i.imgur.com/mmBInsQ.png
Both different, both slightly better (because it's clearer the year field is a drop-down) than safari from TFA. I find FF to be the best usability-wise
- kalleboo 4y agoThe Safari from the OP is on mobile. Chrome and Firefox on Android are arguably even worse than Mobile Safari since they don't even have the little affordance arrow https://i.imgur.com/4w8IvO8.png https://i.imgur.com/4w8IvO8.png Safari on desktop is pretty bad but at least it leaves the text fields there for you to just type in https://i.imgur.com/NSRvPcm.png https://i.imgur.com/NSRvPcm.png
- culi 4y agoAgreed. Safari's mobile implementation is better than Chrome's. Firefox feels like the only one that got it "right" but even then I think many seniors would still not realized they could navigate by year
- culi 4y agoAh I see. So the issue is basically just that on Safari mobile the arrow points to the right instead of downwards. That seems to be the only difference between Safari and Chrome. It seems Chrome's mobile implementation is worse on every front here (second in pic): https://wd.imgix.net/image/vvhSqZboQoZZN9wBvoXq72wzGAf1/uh0U2YQnUMato21MzzbR.png?auto=format&w=1600 https://wd.imgix.net/image/vvhSqZboQoZZN9wBvoXq72wzGAf1/uh0U... I do think Firefox does it best if the whole issue here is just that the year-month picker needs to more obviously look like a drop-down I agree that would be an improvement, but tbh it doesn't seem substantial enough to fully prevent the issue that the seniors in the OP were facing
- dwaite 4y ago> Ah I see. So the issue is basically just that on Safari mobile the arrow points to the right instead of downwards The "correct" direction for mobile safari would actually be left, IMHO. Mac and iOS (as well as the iPod and watch) use navigator patterns heavily, where left to right you have a stack of screens with progressively more detail. So it would make sense to have a MMYYYY view, which opens into a monthly calendar, which goes to a time of day. "Correct" in quotes though because the date/time information is directly manipulatable at every level (it is a picker, after all). Turns out the best level to start at and affordances to pick a date in particular differ by use case. For instance, the iOS Calendar app has a years view, but it shows a full yearly calendar, one per screen, and makes you swipe 15 pages up to see if you had any calendar entries from the first iPhone. This makes sense from a calendar point of view, because it is far more common to want to navigate within the same year or previous year than to want to visit your calendar from 15 years ago. It would be an absolutely terrible interface for seniors to enter their birthdate; far worse than the default here in fact. If you enter a birthdate in the Contacts app, you get the "three tumbler" interface (for Gregorian calendars, at least) - months, days, and years, presumably in a localized order with localized text. It is somewhat unfortunate they didn't just stick with this for the iOS Safari interface, as form input entry already expects that a good chunk of screen real estate will disappear for the keyboard. Instead, they went with a floating picker because thats what most websites currently implement (via javascript)