3 ms·
> Encouraging people to not get a vaccine we decided is harmful speech. Who is "we"? I sure as hell haven't decided that. The supreme court hasn't either, unli
by jakear 4y ago
> Encouraging people to not get a vaccine we decided is harmful speech.
Who is "we"? I sure as hell haven't decided that. The supreme court hasn't either, unlike in the examples you mention.
And my only discomfort with your example sprung from its severe lack of adroitness. My prior response could be roughly translated to "try harder".
- tayo42 4y agoWhy do you think you get to decide what is harmful. What is your credential? Are you an elected policy maker, publish anything about vaccines or virus? Just another shit talker on a message board?
- jakear 4y agoWhy do you think you get to decide? Based on the content the Government has allowed you to see. My statement is in line with what a Harvard professor of epidemiology stated^, so that's something. Of course, you wouldn't know about that if you only looked at what the Government said you're allowed to. ^ https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fcdec26eb-9d2f-47c5-a5f4-f647c4758da9_1378x1600.jpeg https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_pr...
- tayo42 4y agoI haven't decided anything. Idk where you got that idea from. Why did you pick that specific guy from Harvard and not others? Because its inline with your own bias? How come you aren't listening to others? How come you aren't listening to all of them? Idk why you all have this idea that policy is being made on twitter. How many local politicians did you talk to?
- Zpalmtree 4y agojust trust the experts bro