Related: there isn’t enough discussion on actual executive decision making. The experts are supposed to give their inputs, but the buck stops with the executive

Related: there isn’t enough discussion on actual executive decision making. The experts are supposed to give their inputs, but the buck stops with the executives who are tasked with balancing various trade-offs(including the inherent uncertainty in faulty/noisy scientific models). https://www.slowboring.com/p/fda-cost-benefit https://www.slowboring.com/p/fda-cost-benefit There never is one single “right” decision, the balancing of trade-offs is inherently political. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Efficient_frontier https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Efficient_frontier The CDC is just one such expert. Then there are legal experts, economic experts, public opinion experts, foreign policy experts.. in the private sector a CEO(or wall st trader or tech PM) is expected to weigh all of these, decide, and live or die by the consequences of their decisions . Tough job, which is why they get paid so much. An executive has the authority to completely override the experts after consulting an astrologer, tossing a coin, or washing his hands. This fetishization of the Science or villainization of CDC/Fauci is completely misguided.