3 ms·
> Why are these random people not participating in actual research?or writers for real publications? The author of the article wrote for the New York Times, th
by bmarquez 4y ago
> Why are these random people not participating in actual research?or writers for real publications?
The author of the article wrote for the New York Times, the New Yorker, the Atlantic, and Wired. Are those not real publications?
- tayo42 4y agoI mean the people on Twitter the article is writing about > KelleyKga, a self-proclaimed public health fact checker > Andrew Bostom, a Rhode Island physician, This article is just trying to get people outraged by making it an us vs them trying to make this look like it wasn't a fringe view at the time. > American left, the political affiliation of nearly the entire staff at Twitter. Political outrage porn pretending random people are a persecuted
- dannyw 4y agoHow do you state it's a fringe view when the viewpoint was actively being suppressed by everyone? You've chosen a few examples where the posters didn't have strong credentials - how about the Harvard professor?
- tayo42 4y agoYou think the only reason it is a fringe view in the first place is because it was suppressed? The only thing holding back anti mrna research was tweets and pop Sci quality articles in news? The core issue isn't an political us vs them issue like this and other articles suggest. I didn't address the hardvard guy because idk how many other Harvard researchers or w/e the tittle is. Likely the guy is not holding a popular view. How many other people work at hardvard and Stanford and other top universities?
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]