4 ms·

You're conflating who needs to take care of that - if someone on public land doesn't stay on public land, when they are out they can be charged. I don't see wh

You're conflating who needs to take care of that - if someone on public land doesn't stay on public land, when they are out they can be charged. I don't see why you need to change the narrative to be "OH WOE IS ME, THEY TOUCHED THINE PUBLIC, but pissed on thine private a bit". That can be charged with evidence. People MAYBE doing a crime is not a crime, and is a fucked up premise for you to persue, I'm disappointed in you. I hate to break it to you - the govt can define walking paths and public lines.

mikestew 4y ago
...when they are out they can be charged. It's going to be difficult to hold anything resembling a conversation with someone that seems to have missed the key points of the article, if it was read at all. Enjoy the rest of your day.
- daguava 4y ago
  When they are out is literally "When they are in violation of the law" and you're sitting here saying here saying "WOW I CAN'T WAIT TO CHARGE THEM UNTIL THEY CRIME". Do you want to fuck people up before they commit a crime? DO YOU WANT TO CHARGE TRESPASSING BEFORE THEY TRESPASS? Several civil rights movements have logged in to see what happens next.
- daguava 4y ago
  [flagged]