> The question is always when-where-by how much.. Maybe the question should be "if". Despite the years of research, trillions of dollars, and multiple world ra

> The question is always when-where-by how much.. Maybe the question should be "if". Despite the years of research, trillions of dollars, and multiple world ranked supercomputers dedicated to the task - climatologists still can't reliably predict anything from their models. I don't know that the accepted excuse is for it (though I suspect it is just never discussed), but I know that when my models fail - it is because I didn't sufficiently understand the system being modeled. The day these people can accurately predict global atmospheric conditions a year out, that is the day that we can begin discussing the sanity of geoengineering. Until then it is obviously insane. Also, the selling of "cooling credits"... obvious psychotic-money-grab is obvious.