3 ms·
That is what I was thinking, the title was pretty clear and it is a good thing (if anything, probably a larger portion of the land should stay pristine).
by tmpburning 4y ago
That is what I was thinking, the title was pretty clear and it is a good thing (if anything, probably a larger portion of the land should stay pristine).
- diordiderot 4y agoIt's not pristine. Private owners who lock it in use the land
- tmpburning 4y agoThey need to be prosecuted if they don't let the public use public land. How is that even a question... But for the record, I think that land-locked public land should be off-limit to anyone (aka, stay pristine).
- fooqux 4y agoFor what? They can use it as it's public.
- ohyoutravel 4y agoProsecuted for using public land?
- diordiderot 4y ago> To be prosecuted if they don't let the public use public land