> This tweet was labeled “Misleading,” https://twitter.com/davidzweig/status/1607388794772242437?s=20 https://twitter.com/davidzweig/status/1607388794772242437?

> This tweet was labeled “Misleading,” https://twitter.com/davidzweig/status/1607388794772242437?s=20 https://twitter.com/davidzweig/status/1607388794772242437?s=... Because it was misleading, putting it in quotes implies that it wasn't > Editor’s Note: Readers are alerted that the conclusions of this article are subject to criticisms that are being considered by the Editors. A further editorial response will follow once all parties have been given an opportunity to respond in full. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-022-10928-z https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-022-10928-z