> You don't get to tell another person what beliefs they are allowed to have. Never said I did - just said that I’m not going to simply agree to disagree. In a

> You don't get to tell another person what beliefs they are allowed to have. Never said I did - just said that I’m not going to simply agree to disagree. In a disagreement between someone pushing for change and someone advocating for maintaining the status quo, “agreeing to disagree” is a win for the status quo. > In your mind everyone must agree with you, except on things that you define as "policy disagreements"? Again, not what I said. You are free to hold those positions but I’m not going to “agree to disagree” and I’m going to judge someone who holds those positions. > You seriously can not think of single argument against your positions? If you can't, then you are problem, not them. I definitely can, but I don’t particularly care to examine or take seriously the arguments against “trans people shouldn’t be discriminated against”.