They compare to Electron multiple times which makes it seems like it would run as a service with protocol layer support for the defining the UI and callback or

They compare to Electron multiple times which makes it seems like it would run as a service with protocol layer support for the defining the UI and callback or something. But it looks like yet another UI framework/library that will only work with the implementation language (and ffi). The lesson of Electron is that a server/protocol based UI is better than a library. Particularly a large/framework library that requires a lot of resources and is limited in scope would be better done this way to increase it's audience and participation.