Anarchism has an actual political meaning, with lots of literature. Terrorism isn't a consistent ideological position. People don't openly advocate for what th

Anarchism has an actual political meaning, with lots of literature. Terrorism isn't a consistent ideological position. People don't openly advocate for what they self describe as terrorist states, terrorist literature and philosophy, terrorist thinkers and political party. There's no terrorist bookstore, but here in SF I can go down to Haight St and find an anarchist bookstore ... On the other hand I think terrorist is an appropriate description for a Timothy McVeigh or a Kaczynski. I would say those are more violent than most 19th-20th century political anarchists.