3 ms·
Agreed. "Our spammy emails get low open rates and tons of unsubscribes" should be a signal to stop, not find a way brute force your way into my face.
by ROFISH 4y ago
Agreed. "Our spammy emails get low open rates and tons of unsubscribes" should be a signal to stop, not find a way brute force your way into my face.
- kqr 4y agoThe obvious corollary is "our spammy emails get good open rates and low unsubscribes" is a signal that we should continue. Do you agree?
- dsr_ 4y agoThat would be a signal that either: a) it's not spam b) you are feeding intelligent honeypots c) you are dreadfully miscalibrated on open rates and unsubscribes Smart money is on c.
- tracker1 4y agoMaybe... A company I used to work at has a really good adjacent network... I had suggested that they put more effort into their industry blog and newsletter instead of some of the other marketing ideas. Both are now a significant portion of their traction and a lot of people are there for the content. Marketing is just a side effect, even if the purpose of the content was marketing in the first place.
- j5155 4y agoI mean, there are ways to do newsletters well. Articles from Tailscale get on HN often for example. I would agree that spammy emails are not helpful though.