To me, there's a world of difference between "lost at arbitration" and "is illegal." I'm saying that the rules should be clear-cut up front. To draw a compariso

To me, there's a world of difference between "lost at arbitration" and "is illegal." I'm saying that the rules should be clear-cut up front. To draw a comparison with another company that skirts this line: if Uber required drivers to take customer service classes before allowing them to drive people around, and especially if the drivers had to pay for those classes, that, to me, should be illegal. When you hire a gardener to mow your lawn, you don't get to specify whether they use a Greenworks or Black & Decker mower. Or require that they pay you to train them how to trim your junipers. In this situation, the law should be clear up front that this sort of relationship is disallowed, such that the circumstance never occurs to go to arbitration.