3 ms·
I don't understand what anyone is saying anymore
- ryanmarsh 15y agoThe English parlance of American business is utter gobbledygook. The vocabulary within non-profits is even worse. The more I read from Dan Palotta the more endeared I become to him. His book, "Uncharitable" is about the ridiculous mores, both intrinsic and extrinsic, that impair the effectiveness of charities. I was blessed to find him a kindred spirit when I began my own non-profit in 2010. By that time I had developed a tolerance for non-sensical jargon and group-think in business. The non-profit sector, however, is immersed in such a say-nothing, mean-nothing, decide-nothing, do-nothing culture that it's amazing that anything gets accomplished. In fact, were there not a steady influx of starry eyed bleeding hearted young people, it would be a great environment for leaders to commit heinous crimes and find no internal condemnation. Kind of like Jerry Sandusky and The Second Mile.
- tzs 15y agoThis reminds me of an anecdote from "Surely You're Joking, Mr. Feynman!". Feynman had been invited to a cross discipline conference on the ethics of equality. While there, he was given a paper to read by a sociologist. Here's Feynman's description of reading that paper (the list he refers to was a list of books they had sent around before the conference): ----------------------------------- There was a sociologist who had written a paper for us all to read—something he had written ahead of time. I started to read the damned thing and my eyes were coming out—I couldn't make head nor tail of it. I figured it was because I hadn’t read any of the books on that list. I had this uneasy feeling of, "I'm not adequate," until finally I said to myself, "I'm going to stop, and read one sentence slowly so I can figure out what the hell it means." So I stopped at random and read the next sentence very carefully. I can't remember it precisely, but it was very close to this: "The individual member of the social community often receives his information via visual, symbolic channels." I went back and forth over it and translated. You know what it means? "People read." Then I went over the next sentence. And I realized that I could translate that one, also. Then it became a kind of empty business. "Sometimes people read. Sometimes people listen to the radio." And so on. But written in such a fancy way that I couldn't understand it at first. And when I finally deciphered it, there was nothing to it.
- garethsprice 15y agoWhen I was younger I thought long words and jargon were a sign of intelligence. George Orwell's essay, "Politics and the English language", changed overnight how I think when I'm writing: http://www.mtholyoke.edu/acad/intrel/orwell46.htm http://www.mtholyoke.edu/acad/intrel/orwell46.htm Learning to filter jargon and communicate it in plain English is probably the most valuable skill I've acquired in my career.
- auxbuss 15y agoBringing it closer to home, and admirably demonstrating my pedantry, every other thread on HN contains, to me, nonsensical extensions to words, such as: "build out" for build, "abstract away" for abstract, and so on, there are hundreds of these "why use one good word when two will mess it up real good".