3 ms·
I also want to mention the Lichee Pi Nano, though it is much smaller and targeting a different use case: https://www.cnx-software.com/2018/08/17/licheepi-nano-c
by mmatants 4y ago
I also want to mention the Lichee Pi Nano, though it is much smaller and targeting a different use case: https://www.cnx-software.com/2018/08/17/licheepi-nano-cheap-sd-card-sized-linux-board/ https://www.cnx-software.com/2018/08/17/licheepi-nano-cheap-.... Made an embedded distro Buildroot config for that one some time ago (https://github.com/unframework/licheepi-nano-buildroot https://github.com/unframework/licheepi-nano-buildroot).
- netr0ute 4y agoI don't know why anybody would ever get the LicheePi Nano instead of the 4A or the regular LicheePi, because these two boards' main selling point is that they're RISC-V which the Nano isn't.
- nine_k 4y agoFor some, the physical size is key. Seeed Xiao, Lichee Nano, Beetle, etc fit where e.g. an Arduino Nano won't.
- thamer 4y agoYes the physical size can be important, and so can the power draw. Just like you wouldn't use a full-fledged Raspberry Pi for use cases where a Raspberry Pi Nano or other low-power microcontroller is enough.