3 ms·
There were agencies at the time that did not cooperate with the lavender scare[1]. Completely false to argue that no one treated gay people with dignity before
by sigmar 4y ago
There were agencies at the time that did not cooperate with the lavender scare[1]. Completely false to argue that no one treated gay people with dignity before modern times.
1. "The Hoey committee records also show that a small number of agency officials were initially not entirely forthcoming. Investigator James Thomas grew exasperated with John Shover, director of personnel at the National Labor Relations Board. "His attitude at the time," Thomas writes in a July 20 memorandum summarizing a telephone interview, "did not appear to be too cooperative." When Thomas proposed an in-person meeting to discuss two cases of homosexuality in the department, Shover balked. According to Thomas, "he more or less refused to receive me for this purpose and said rather bluntly: 'I am not going to let you see any of our files.'" This occasional resistance and the subtle variations of opinion evident in the committee’s records suggest that, at least at the start of the scare, each agency may have had its own nuanced stance toward homosexuality." https://www.archives.gov/publications/prologue/2016/summer/lavender.html https://www.archives.gov/publications/prologue/2016/summer/l...
- supermdguy 4y agoI think their argument was that Webb wasn't exceptionally bigoted for his time, not that there weren't others less bigoted than him.
- drewcoo 4y ago> Completely false to argue that no one treated gay people with dignity before modern times. That claim wasn't made. This is a strawman. But in keeping with the article.
- naasking 4y ago> Completely false to argue that no one treated gay people with dignity before modern times. They literally said the exact opposite, emphasis added: > The idea that all human beings should be treated with dignity regardless of race, creed, or things like sexual orientation is an exceptionally recent modern idea… at least as a mainstream attitude. You can find people in the past who held it but it was very much a fringe idea until the last 50 years at best.