> Don’t make the logical mistake of assuming “silent majority” claims are automatically “likely false.” Is that a mistake? Would it not be fairly safe to assu

> Don’t make the logical mistake of assuming “silent majority” claims are automatically “likely false.” Is that a mistake? Would it not be fairly safe to assume that if someone had hard evidence to back up their big claim they would not resort to crediting "a silent majority"? Until they make a falsifiable claim, I'm going to err on the side of "probably bullshit."