5 ms·
Who said you had to do the work? If this was a topic that was somehow discussed previously, should there not be some kind of mechanism to indicate this in the
by mactavish88 4y ago
Who said you had to do the work?
If this was a topic that was somehow discussed previously, should there not be some kind of mechanism to indicate this in the flagging process? (Ideally automated)
- theCrowing 4y agoClintel was even in the news cycle a few years ago and you submit it without even googling it before? You impute that I have a particular stance on climate change, but I honestly believe you have because no person without an agenda would play naive like you. I myself just hate misinformation and people that share and play victim when nobody engages with it.
- mactavish88 4y agoI get literally nothing from the news search in DuckDuckGo when I search for “clintel” It still seems you assume I have a particular agenda here beyond wanting to have a conversation on the topic.
- theCrowing 4y agoNow you also play blind... so, you pretend that you didn't see the articles linked below before you pressed the "news" button? https://duckduckgo.com/?q=clintel&t=h_&ia=web https://duckduckgo.com/?q=clintel&t=h_&ia=web First Page Results: https://www.desmog.com/climate-intelligence-foundation-clintel/ https://www.desmog.com/climate-intelligence-foundation-clint... https://insideclimatenews.org/todaysclimate/experts-debunk-viral-post-claiming-1100-scientists-say-theres-no-climate-emergency/ https://insideclimatenews.org/todaysclimate/experts-debunk-v... https://www.thequint.com/climate-change/1200-scientists-claim-that-climate-change-is-not-real-heres-the-truth https://www.thequint.com/climate-change/1200-scientists-clai... https://climatefeedback.org/evaluation/letter-signed-by-500-scientists-relies-on-inaccurate-claims-about-climate-science/ https://climatefeedback.org/evaluation/letter-signed-by-500-... https://www.resilience.org/stories/2019-09-16/climate-science-deniers-planning-european-misinformation-campaign-leaked-documents-reveal/ https://www.resilience.org/stories/2019-09-16/climate-scienc...
- Gunnerhead 4y agoCan you please not say things such as “you also play blind”? You’re being mean and snarky, completely violating HN guidelines. We can all benefit from kind and helpful interactions, that’s what makes this website great. “Be kind. Don't be snarky. Have curious conversation; don't cross-examine. Please don't fulminate. Please don't sneer, including at the rest of the community. Edit out swipes.” [1] [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
- theCrowing 4y agoIf someone argues in good faith I would probably do it but he is clearly trying to gaslight here. Or do you believe DDG is jeopardizing an essential part of their search business just to fuck with him?
- Gunnerhead 4y agoI think we should give everyone the benefit of the doubt and be kind.
- theCrowing 4y agoYou are right, it is important to approach them with an open mind and to give others the benefit of the doubt. However, if someone begins to engage in gaslighting tactics, it becomes necessary to confront and challenge their behavior in order to prevent them from manipulating and distorting the conversation. Gaslighting is a harmful and insidious form of manipulation that seeks to undermine the credibility and reality of others, and it is essential to stand up to it in order to maintain the integrity and honesty of the discussion. By actively and assertively addressing gaslighting, we can create a safer and more respectful space for open and honest discourse even if being assertive means writing less candid than usual.
- mactavish88 4y agoI get none of those links on the first page. It took several pages of search results before I started seeing any of the links you’ve shared here.