But in practice, as I said, trivial. Paradigms are also trivial. A good modern language supports all "paradigms" -- styles, really -- equally, and unholy mixes

But in practice, as I said, trivial. Paradigms are also trivial. A good modern language supports all "paradigms" -- styles, really -- equally, and unholy mixes of them, because problems don't sort themselves out neatly according to CS fads. If you are failing to mix up styles according to dictates of problems, you are fielding suboptimal designs, cramming problems into shoes that fit badly.