Attacking the group here is funny, because it ignores the idea to go after the flawed people implementing it. Instead, you should try and explain why it’s okay

Attacking the group here is funny, because it ignores the idea to go after the flawed people implementing it. Instead, you should try and explain why it’s okay to be offended when someone expresses disgust at your viewpoint, but not okay to be offended by a viewpoint. Why does freedom of expression stop arbitrarily at the person saying the disgusting thing? It’s almost as if you want to prevent the expression (manifest in the form of bans and boycots), or something…