3 ms·
>"Because speech doesn’t cause physical harm or loss to others." Nope, that is trivially wrong with the obvious counter examples being slander and libel.
by icedistilled 4y ago
>"Because speech doesn’t cause physical harm or loss to others."
Nope, that is trivially wrong with the obvious counter examples being slander and libel.
- int_19h 4y agoWhich is why they're excluded from the definition of free speech pretty much everywhere?