3 ms·

"Nazi" is such an annoying term these days... if a group shares a single idea or belief the nazi party did AND one doesn't like that group then they get called

"Nazi" is such an annoying term these days... if a group shares a single idea or belief the nazi party did AND one doesn't like that group then they get called Nazis. Whether it's nationalisation, nationalism, not liking new pronouns, anti-immigrant sentiment, believing in violence to achieve political aims, state surveillance or ethnic segregation, believing Jews have too much influence or even having not disassociated from a group or individual with one of the above beliefs... having even a single thing in common (even if every other belief is different) is enough for the label these days... Makes virtually every group (including antifa and BLM ironically) a "nazi" group, rendering the term meaningless.

wpietri 4y ago
Excellent try at running the conversation off into an irrelevant maze there. Who could possibly know if Stormfront, who you brought up and I was referring to, could be meaningfully be called neo-Nazi? Certainly not anybody very intent on keeping it murky. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stormfront_(website) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stormfront_(website) Regardless, your list of items help prove my point that there is no neutral. One can decide to platform or ban any or all of those things. Choosing to publish it all is no more neutral than banning it all.