I care because I feel that the attitude is destructive and that there are better approaches that can be taken. I've outlined them other places ITT already. >As

I care because I feel that the attitude is destructive and that there are better approaches that can be taken. I've outlined them other places ITT already. >As we see here you still waste time arguing with people even when you assume bad faith >arguing If there's another way to get my point of view read, I'd love to hear it! >when you assume bad faith Logical fallacy. I do not necessarily assume bad faith ...I simply do not assume good faith. >Anyway, very few people really argue in bad faith, I would encourage you to try to have some sustained long-term on youtube comments or facebook if you haven't already. I'm being completely serious here -that will present you with numerous examples of people arguing in bad faith. I have the impression when you say "arguing" you could actually be meaning "discussing"; the difference being one aims to convince another person -the other simply seeks to share veiwpoints. One's adverserial, the other isn't. Am I reading you correctly?