3 ms·
This is true. They do hide some legal sites (i.e. not banned or prohibited content) that they or vocal interest groups push back on but it's really miniscule i
by mc32 4y ago
This is true. They do hide some legal sites (i.e. not banned or prohibited content) that they or vocal interest groups push back on but it's really miniscule in scope compared to chatGPT. ChatGPT is like the parent of a 5 year old who tries to hide reality from a child --except the people using chatGPT are not five year-olds. It's very passive aggressive. It's almost as though it were built by very pious religious people, except it treats everything as needing protection from reality so as not to offend the person interacting with it.
I wouldn't mind if it had a toggle such as "take me back to the kittens" to shield me from the potential informational dregs but also allow semi-unfiltered access (shielding me from illegal content for example).
- kderbyma 4y agoyeah for a language model it sure did have a lot of opinions all the while professing to have none...and once a session gets stuck in a rut, it turns into a moody defensive model which then gets a bit funny sometimes.