3 ms·
sure: if you extend things to the extreme. Ignoring that illogical connection between “feeding people” and “pop growth” - there is no, that I have read, indica
by flandish 4y ago
sure: if you extend things to the extreme. Ignoring that illogical connection between “feeding people” and “pop growth” - there is no, that I have read, indication that an increase in pop will become untenable, under a system designed to take care of its people. (Not under capitalism, for instance.)
- 29athrowaway 4y agoUnder a system that ensures housing, food, health, education, you also need some form of population control. The premise is that if you lower mortality rates you lower birth rates, but that's because once enough people survive you reach a capacity, which is established through economic pressure.
- flandish 4y agoWhere do you (how do you) connect housing, food, essential services to a lower mortality rate and further, how do you connect more people (consuming yet paying taxes) to a capacity as you mention it?