> but the state shouldn't be regulating to such a level Why not? > We don't need nanny states How do you define a nanny state? It feels like you're against a

> but the state shouldn't be regulating to such a level Why not? > We don't need nanny states How do you define a nanny state? It feels like you're against any regulations at all, but plenty of countries have laws about how businesses operate and specifications that their products must meet to be allowed to be sold. I'm not sure how a law intended to reduce electronic waste is somehow indicative of a "nanny state", whatever that is, unless you just believe everything should be up to individual choice. Which doesn't make sense to me, because I don't know how individual choice would be able to solve things like protecting the environment from manufacturing waste processes or preventing the extinction of wildlife.