> It's somewhat possible still to discern images generated using AI. currently if it includes "photograph" and includes humans or animals, there is a chance th

> It's somewhat possible still to discern images generated using AI. currently if it includes "photograph" and includes humans or animals, there is a chance that you can get a good image once out of every 50 generated images. by "good" i mean "does not need to be retouched". If i use one of the other models (instead of stable diffusion's model) that goes to 1 in 10 images. If i use img2img and all of my understanding of the generation, i can probably generate 8 images and get 3 usable ones. All this is to say, depending on the subject, i could generate stuff that is indistinguishable from traditional art, in whatever medium or representation you want. And i can't make art, edit photos, etc. My limits of understanding of traditional art and editing is "crop/rotate" and adjusting the lights and darks to get the correct contrast and color rendering, and then save and publish. On your primary topic, something i have been noticing ramp up in the past 10 days or so is weird typos and even "new words" being created, where it looks like someone was typing on a phone and didn't bother to check the output. I'm not sure if it's some new AI/ML, or perhaps there's a bug in the "keyboard input" part of android, perhaps. It's like the opposite of your adding a dash in "defederated" because there's a red squiggly line under the word in the input box.