3 ms·
Their license terms aren’t being violated. Artists give ArtStation and the like a license to use their uploads for training ML models. ML models also appear to
by dymk 4y ago
Their license terms aren’t being violated. Artists give ArtStation and the like a license to use their uploads for training ML models.
ML models also appear to be more fair-use respecting than some human artists, who blatantly trace artwork. The ML model does not have the physical space to trace the works it's trained on.
- zimpenfish 4y ago> Artists give ArtStation and the like a license to use their uploads for training ML models. As far as I can tell from a quick Wayback Machine test, that only seems to have appeared in the last fortnight[1]. None of the existing models could have been trained under the license. [1] https://www.artstation.com/tos https://www.artstation.com/tos has it as section 46 "Artificial Intelligence" mentioning the "NoAI" tag. But https://web.archive.org/web/20221214082018/https://www.artstation.com/tos https://web.archive.org/web/20221214082018/https://www.artst... has neither.