> Look past that person's specific title more at the general problem; the systemic bureaucracy. My point was exactly the converse: let's look at evidence for t

> Look past that person's specific title more at the general problem; the systemic bureaucracy. My point was exactly the converse: let's look at evidence for the "general problem of systemic bureaucracy" instead of using ridiculous job titles as a stand-in straw man to beat up. Laughing at a woke job title is a logical fallacy. If you want to make a broad point that Universities spend more on administration than necessary, I'd want to see numbers comparing them to similar private organizations, etc...