4 ms·
The last springer book I've had is so poorly written that there is absolutely no way it was proofread. It is not just one mistake here or there. It looks like a
by ta988 4y ago
The last springer book I've had is so poorly written that there is absolutely no way it was proofread. It is not just one mistake here or there. It looks like a quick draft with incomplete sentences, repetitions all over. Looks like those "cheap" packt books.
- smnrchrds 4y agoLooks like someone sent "fundamentals_of_math-e4-v2-final-finalv3-final.docx" to the printer instead of "fundamentals_of_math-e4-v2-final-finalv3-final-final.docx"
- riedel 4y agoI published a book with degruyter and there is no proofreading at all. No support to get e.g. the colours right for printing. They only give you some example books, a rough latex template and minor advice on content and audience. Once it is published they will ask you if you want to prepare a revised version. It was OK because e.g. my students get a free ebook version anyways via the university subscription and I guess it is ok for the rest to pay the overpriced but well printed book.
- ta988 4y agoIf your students get it for free why not make it open access on wikibooks or something like that? The only reason people in academia were publishing the books as books was for resume stuffing but that was a different domain.
- riedel 4y agoActually resume stuffing was the major reason (not to get a job but rather for positioning oneself). I wrote it in my free time actually (my income on the book is about a 10th of the time put into it). That it is free to the students is just a nice side effect. The target audience is decision makers in smaller companies. You do not reach them via wikibooks. I guess I would have never written it as open access, because in this case I would have left it to others. I would like to see a peer review/editing community for wikibooks btw, that actually would lead to better quality of books. distill.pub eg IMHO is great.