3 ms·
There are a group of people releasing the Twitter Files. Are we going to name call them all as sex criminals? Were any even found to be guilty by a court or ar
by lhnz 4y ago
There are a group of people releasing the Twitter Files. Are we going to name call them all as sex criminals? Were any even found to be guilty by a court or are you simply applying dirty tricks? And how is that relevant to the truth of the content? Are you going to respond to me telling me that at the root of this is Hunter Biden's penis?
- astrange 4y agoNo, only Taibbi is. I think there’s a third guy but can’t say I know anything about him. But this is something in the real world, not a logic puzzle, and unfortunately in the real world you actually do need to consider the context of everything using all available information. I mean, you going “this guy is just coincidentally a sex offender” is not the common man on the street’s response, and most journalists are literally not sex offenders. I don’t know what Elon is doing. He’s of course extremely compromised by multiple governments, I mean he owns SpaceX and a Chinese Tesla factory, and Saudi Arabia (who’s planted spies at Twitter before) is a major investor now. I also suspect Elon doesn’t know what he’s doing, though.
- lhnz 4y agoI think you should apply the same criticism and context to your own posts, which literally consist of trying to link information to sex crime in order to attempt to change the conversation.
- Eisenstein 4y agoYou have effectively moved the conversation from 'the FBI requesting removal of illegal content' is completely different from'the FBI is acting to enforce censorship of protected speech with twitters willing compliance' to 'is the journalist being an alleged sex criminal relevant'. So lets all stop that line and go back to 'regardless of anyone's past activity raping peoples, you are wrong.' Retort?