2 ms·
The list starts with things that may well have considerable historical evidence, but ends by proposing an argument that would not even be logically valid: one c
by mannykannot 4y ago
The list starts with things that may well have considerable historical evidence, but ends by proposing an argument that would not even be logically valid: one could rationally hold that the material world is not all that exists, without accepting that Christ’s resurrection occurred.
As for calling materialism an a priori leap of faith, well, that hardly distinguishes it from the alternatives, though maybe that’s the point.
Nevertheless, a merry Christmas to one and all!
- bazoom42 4y agoYeah, just as an example religious Jews and Muslims do not subscribe to “material world is all that exists” but nevertheless does not belive in the ressurrection of Jesus.