4 ms·
The open source software movement at large does not appreciate companies trying to water down the meaning of "open source" to mean the same thing as "source ava
by commoner 4y ago
The open source software movement at large does not appreciate companies trying to water down the meaning of "open source" to mean the same thing as "source available" for software, because the term "open source" guarantees users additional rights.
The Open Source Initiative is one of many groups that define open source software as including the right to not only view the source code but also to modify and redistribute it. Others include
Merriam-Webster Dictionary:
> of software : having the source code freely available for possible modification and redistribution
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/open-source https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/open-source
New Oxford American Dictionary:
> denoting software for which the original source code is made freely available and may be redistributed and modified
https://subscription.packtpub.com/book/web-development/9781782168751/14/ch14lvl1sec101/what-is-open-source https://subscription.packtpub.com/book/web-development/97817...
And the authors of all of the academic literature cited in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open-source_software https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open-source_software
- counttheforks 4y agoGreat, I'm not a company, just a regular person. Language is defined based on how regular people use it.
- commoner 4y agoYes, and regular people who use open source software understand that they have the freedom to modify and redistribute open source software. On the other hand, there is a minority that tries to sell proprietary software by misusing a term that originated in the open source community and incorrectly applying it to software that is not open source.