3 ms·
…exactly what they said? They were saying they are not going to invade as late as February 20, 2022. Then they said their objectives are total conquest on Febru
by varjag 4y ago
…exactly what they said? They were saying they are not going to invade as late as February 20, 2022. Then they said their objectives are total conquest on February 24, 2022 in a public TV address. They threatened nukes (everyone from Putin himself to TV pundits) for months until Xi publicly chided him.
But I am impressed how one can take perhaps the most morally unambiguous conflict in the century so far and still make it an uncertainty.
- jessaustin 4y agoWas there something ambiguous about destroying the most prosperous African nation?
- hutzlibu 4y agoAre you refering to Libya? If so, you mean that Gadaffi was a saint or something?
- IG_Semmelweiss 4y agoI call your lockebie bombing. I raise you 1 bush iraq invasion and 1 obama Afghanistan quagmire and drone assassinations. I'll throw in a trump TMZ secret bus recording too, just for kicks.
- jessaustin 4y agoSainthood is not the standard to which any politician is held.
- varjag 4y agoI guess that part when Gaddafi promised to massacre the revolting cities street by street got many frowning.
- jessaustin 4y agoYour intel is six years out of date: https://www.salon.com/2016/09/16/u-k-parliament-report-details-how-natos-2011-war-in-libya-was-based-on-lies/ https://www.salon.com/2016/09/16/u-k-parliament-report-detai... Of course, those of us who pay any attention whatsoever already knew that back in 2011.