5 ms·
Not to mention that such limitations accelerate the fragmentation of the Internet
by cromka 4y ago
Not to mention that such limitations accelerate the fragmentation of the Internet
- thefounder 4y agoYou end-up with fragmentation of corporations not fragmentation of the internet. If Google sets a self governed license based entity in Europe with staff from Europe(executives including the CEO etc) then you have two separate entities playing by different rules(EU based or U.S based) linked just through a licensing deal. Think of it like Microsoft sells On-premise Azure instalations to governments. The EU and US entities would share no internal data b/c they would be two different companies that use the same software for different clients.
- jacooper 4y agoSo be it. If its either one country spying on everyone, or no one. I think its better to be no one.
- foreverCarlos 4y agoAll countries that tightly control their Internet bubble have very free societies: just look at NK, China, Saudi Arabia, Russia, etc. If only the US could have as little spying as those countries!
- jacooper 4y agoLol, you think Saudi Arabia can be compared to China? You have no idea. And the problem is not the spying it self, rather its that one country has all the data mining companies, and has regulations to force these companies to give them data even if its breaks local laws. And when a truly foreign competitor showed up, guess what? They banned it(huawei) and now they want to ban software too(Tiktok). Yet they go moaning about data protection laws limiting their companies reach and spying power. > If only the US could have as little spying as those countries! They already do, if not more. These countries have local spying power, and foreign teams. While the US almost controls the entire internet, they can spy on anyone anywhere.