3 ms·
As I understand it, submissions are moderated (albeit lightly -- not to the degree of formal peer review). So, since it's on the arXiv, we can assume that the m
by Twisol 4y ago
As I understand it, submissions are moderated (albeit lightly -- not to the degree of formal peer review). So, since it's on the arXiv, we can assume that the moderators felt it belongs there.
I've seen a number of other book-length items on the arXiv before, including e.g. Seven Sketches in Compositionality [1], so this isn't a particularly new trend, either.
[1] https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.05316v3 https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.05316v3
- godelski 4y agoTo post there you simply need someone to vet you. Typically your advisor, coauthor, or a colleague but they don't check the relationship. The system is rarely abused tbh. Introductions, surveys, and books are actively welcomed. At least I welcome them and find them extremely useful. We want open access (and open source) knowledge, right?