It's unfair to put 100% of the blame for this on Stanford. A lot of the things they're doing are responses to the current political climate in the world today.

It's unfair to put 100% of the blame for this on Stanford. A lot of the things they're doing are responses to the current political climate in the world today. Any discrimination, or even perception of discrimination, is likely to have non-zero consequences for Stanford. Furthermore, people are actively looking for discrimination, because "$27 billion university has discrimination among its fraternities and sororities" is a juicy news headline, if you can make it stick. Is creating an "associate vice provost of inclusion, community and integrative learning" the right thing for Stanford to do? Hard to say. What would _you_ do?