4 ms·
i agree with everything you're saying except "there's too many humans". there's plenty of space for all the people, if we could only live a bit more densely.
by notatoad 4y ago
i agree with everything you're saying except "there's too many humans". there's plenty of space for all the people, if we could only live a bit more densely.
- hutzlibu 4y agoIsn't that exactly what the person above said? "We need a way for people to live in tight urban environments, yes, with national banks, cattle fields, golf courses, strip malls, and mcdonalds, but leaving more of the country side to stay wild. " Personally I would disagree though. You can have humans and wild nature in coexistence (up to a certain point). I don't know about the US, but here in germany there is a strong trend to abandon the concept of sterile lawns and have more wild in between. I really like it, even though it is just a start. The bigger threat to wildlife are monocultures. I rather have more diverse fields with less or no pesticides and less yield, than the ecological deserts of conventional agriculture.