Genuinely curious - what is your explanation for why the recusal happened? Your arguments paint it as clearly unusual or invalid but not knowing you or the det

Genuinely curious - what is your explanation for why the recusal happened? Your arguments paint it as clearly unusual or invalid but not knowing you or the details of the case, what is your case for believing you rather than the facts of the case, that a professional judge made this decision? Could you lay out an alternative explanation for why this happened? i.e. you're making strong claims that this is obviously wrong, yet not explaining why it happened. Barring detailed knowledge, tie usually goes to reality rather than the HN commenter.