3 ms·
Similar is true of abortions. The majority/control was there - more than once - and despite knowing Roe v Wade was on shifting sands the Dems refused to act. Th
by chiefalchemist 4y ago
Similar is true of abortions. The majority/control was there - more than once - and despite knowing Roe v Wade was on shifting sands the Dems refused to act. The issue empowers The Politics Industrial Complex but does little to work for We The People.
https://freakonomics.com/podcast/im-your-biggest-fan/ https://freakonomics.com/podcast/im-your-biggest-fan/
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- dragonwriter 4y ago> Similar is true of abortions. The majority/control was there - more than once - and despite knowing Roe v Wade was on shifting sands the Dems refused to act. Act how? Unlike marriage (where the FFC clause gives Congress an explicit power), the “codify Roe” refrain was always hollow since without Roe being a 14th Amendment right there is no real Constitutional argument for authority for federal codification.
- chiefalchemist 4y agoI don't know the particulars but the current POTUS did come out and promise a codified response. Other reports at the time also implied proactive action could have been taken. This was simply yet another issue that was intentionally managed to benefit The Politics Industrial Complex. Note: I don't consider HuffPost to be a beacon of journalism. It's simply the top of the SERP. I'm confident better have reported the same. https://www.huffpost.com/entry/biden-codify-roe-v-wade-congress_n_634eb359e4b0e376dc10cb7e https://www.huffpost.com/entry/biden-codify-roe-v-wade-congr...