3 ms·
It doesn't work in practice, because a day of bad work by some non-trained city dweller will most likely do a lot more than 200$ of loss of income, if not strai
by polotics 4y ago
It doesn't work in practice, because a day of bad work by some non-trained city dweller will most likely do a lot more than 200$ of loss of income, if not straight damage. And then there are the accidents: "was your staff qualified to operate the machine that ate their hand?" ... Best of luck finding insurance for this projecz...
- RosanaAnaDana 4y agoThis is reactionary logic without perspective. Plenty of people currently pay fir lifestyle vacations that have a bit of danger.
- shkkmo 4y agoThe work doesn't have to be unsupervised and doesn't have to be work where mistakes carry large negative risks. Think of it more as an extended tour / homestay with some participatory elements. We know it is possible to do because WWOOFing has been a thing for a long time. The question is more if there is enough of a market to cover the increased costs and maybe loss of productivity.