4 ms·
Being unable to prove there was not a breach is correct because you are unable to prove there was a breach, meaning there is no useful evidence in the post. As
by paulnpace 4y ago
Being unable to prove there was not a breach is correct because you are unable to prove there was a breach, meaning there is no useful evidence in the post.
As I demonstrated in what might be called talking past the sale, there are other attacks that have nothing to do with the security of the technologies used.
I don't know the person who originally stated this, but as the popular refrain goes: "security is a process, not a technology."