> The argument I'm trying to make is that an article serving as an explainer of a complex legal topic should be factually correct It’s weird that you’re pointi

> The argument I'm trying to make is that an article serving as an explainer of a complex legal topic should be factually correct It’s weird that you’re pointing out an irrelevant technical detail which misses the point of the opinion piece. The point is that SBF was able to walk out of jail without paying anything and the author finds this absurd.