3 ms·
I've had the same thought and took it even further. The cloud companies are in the business of managing capital, namely datacenters. They are not in the busines
by Vt71fcAqt7 4y ago
I've had the same thought and took it even further. The cloud companies are in the business of managing capital, namely datacenters. They are not in the business of designing µarchs; to the extent that they do (ie. Graviton) it is to lower costs. For this reason I belive it is economically favorable for them to jointly create and fund an open µarch. Note thay they are already doing this through a middleman known as the Intel/AMD monopoly. Also note that a similar thing has happened already with Linux. Collectively throwing a few hundred million at the problem (or buying sifive, for example) could save money in the long run. Although I can't be certain about that.
I hope someone pitches this idea to these companies. I think some people at Google may be thinking in this direction being that they are paying for tape out of open hardware at no cost to the developers and are investing in tooling.
- monocasa 4y agoThat's what Alibaba is already doing too. They bought T-Head and have been releasing open source RISC-V cores that have been taped out in a move to "commoditize your complement", thus bringing total costs down by making their vendors' markets more competitive.
- tubs 4y agoGraviton isn't a custom uarch though. It's a set of fairly standard cores with all the actual magic being the fabric and and peripherals.