3 ms·
DJGPP was great, but if you want to drop to assembly for performance reasons, NASM was the way to go. AT&T syntax on Intel was a poor choice IMO, and the pain o
by mmastrac 4y ago
DJGPP was great, but if you want to drop to assembly for performance reasons, NASM was the way to go. AT&T syntax on Intel was a poor choice IMO, and the pain of juggling inline assembly register requirements was just not worth it.