4 ms·

What's wrong with these? https://wikimediafoundation.org/support/where-your-money-goes/ https://wikimediafoundation.org/support/where-your-money-goe... https:

What's wrong with these? https://wikimediafoundation.org/support/where-your-money-goes/ https://wikimediafoundation.org/support/where-your-money-goe... https://wikimediafoundation.org/about/financial-reports/ https://wikimediafoundation.org/about/financial-reports/ https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation At some point you have to ask yourself "what would victim blaming look like, and how different is that from this"

marcinzm 4y ago
>What's wrong with these? These don't seem to allow me to actually answer the questions OP brought up but merely give high level summaries of X% is spent on these N things or the strategic areas without money allotment. If the point of OPs questions is that knowing that information would make me more likely to donate then I don't know that information. >At some point you have to ask yourself "what would victim blaming look like, and how different is that from this" Interesting how questioning giving a money to a specific non-profit is now called victim blaming. I guess corporations really are people now.
- flipbrad 4y ago
  The OP didn't genuinely ask any questions, they simply mischaracterised the banners that are on Wikipedia at the moment. I'm not the only person in this thread that seems to be having a hard time finding one that's implying Wikipedia could shut down at any moment. "Yes the criticism is wrong, but that's your fault for not informing the critics" is absolutely victim blaming.